Rush Limbaugh: A Hypocrite of Epic Proportions (and I mean that literally)

Rush Limbaugh Un-American

Question: What’s the difference between a catfish and Rush Limbaugh?
Answer: One is a scum sucking bottom dweller and the other is a fish.

Rush Limbaugh uses sarcasm, in absence of anything coherent to say, to talk about President Obama accomplishing what the Bush administration failed to accomplish, the killing of Osama bin Laden. Rush Limbaugh, a big old sweating hog of a radio talk show host, could not join in the applause for our President for successfully pulling off a mission that resulted in the death of Public Enemy No. 1, Osama bin Laden.

Rush Limbaugh sounded as though he were praising President Obama on his show when he said, “Thank God for President Obama.” It wasn’t genuine folks. It was sarcasm. On his website he says, “Congratulations, Mr. President, for Continuing the Bush Anti-Terror Policy.” What he should have said is “Continuing the failed Bush Anti-Terror Policy.”

Like it or not swine boy, President Obama accomplished in two years what the Bush administration failed to accomplish in a little more than seven years. So Bush had the reigns from 2000 to 2008 and guess what his priority was? Misleading the Americans with the threat of fake weapons of mass destruction which resulted in engaging us in a costly war in Iraq. Was Osama bin Laden in Iraq? No. He did get Saddam Hussein though. Of course, Saddam Hussein was not the architect of 9/11 which resulted in 3,000 Americans being killed. He was just the guy who allegedly tried to kill his daddy.

Bush didn't get Osama bin Laden

It is unifying events like getting Osama bin Laden after all these years, that separate the Americans from the un-American and it should come as no surprise that Rush Limbaugh falls into the latter category. This is a man who’s ego will not allow him to celebrate this event with the rest of the country. His hatred for Obama will not allow it.

“My friends, this is hilarious. When Obama couldn’t find Osama, even though he promised he would, we were told Osama was of no consequence whatsoever. This regime, they cannot keep their lies straight. They can’t keep their lies straight. We were told for the last three or four years, ‘Hey, y’know, dialysis. The guy’s a shell of his former self. He’s not even operationally in control.’ We’ve heard this over and over again from this bunch. Now, the New York Times, in an effort to build up the strongest guy in the Situation Room, Barack Obama, in an effort to build him up, ‘Guess what, folks. Usama bin Laden has been at the helm this whole time.’ Yes, Osama has to be built up, has to be amplified, has to be blown up, has to be made the Big Kahuna is order to make it seem like Obama has pulled off a major coup here.” Full Story

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Be Sociable, Share!

Tags: , ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Get Adobe Flash player